The planning and predevelopment phase moves your project from general idea to more detailed project. At this point, you have identified what type of project you want to develop. You have evaluated your team’s internal capacity and determined who has expertise in each area and considered areas where outside consultants or partnerships are needed.
By the end of this phase, you will have a housing development model and an understanding of the financial feasibility and anticipated costs for your project. You will also have started to evaluate and assemble sources of financing for your project.
Many of the decisions you make about your proposed development during this phase will shape who benefits from your project; how it looks; its costs to both build and operate; and its eligibility and competitiveness for financing. A thorough and well-managed predevelopment process can minimize risks in the overall development process; maximize homes’ intended benefits; and set future phases up for success.
Assessing Project Feasibility
At this point in the process, you will be investing time and resources into additional study and reviews to demonstrate the viability of your project. This due diligence helps to ensure your project can move forward with as few disruptions as possible.
This section focuses on two areas of due diligence:
- Environmental, focusing on site selection and a project’s surroundings, and
- Market Feasibility, which includes consideration of affordability needs and costs.
Site Selection
Site selection refers to the process of examining and assessing different land (or existing developments in the case of preservation or adaptive reuse) to determine which site(s) best meets your goals in developing affordable housing. Site selection influences other aspects of your development project, including the overall financial feasibility, design, and ability to align with community needs. For more information on Site Selection, please see Phase 3: Site Selection and Design.
Housing Affordability
Your development model should account for your housing affordability goals. Although you may need to make some adjustments based on the results of your feasibility assessments, having targeted affordability ranges will ensure you remain aligned with your goals and help you make other development model decisions.
Affordable housing for your target income ranges can be achieved using a variety of approaches described throughout this guide, but your targeting will influence the tenure and help you determine if you will need a subsidy to achieve and maintain affordability. For more detailed information on affordability and average incomes in Mississippi, please see Phase 1: Visioning. Your affordability limits may be determined by the funding sources you use.
Calculating Affordability
Calculating what affordability means for your community and the project is important. What level of affordable housing is needed to meet community demand? How do we calculate that affordability?
For the purposes of assessing the market and understanding project feasibility, affordable housing developers and practitioners often use a metric known as Area Median Income, or AMI, and express affordability as a percentage of the AMI.
As detailed in the Getting Started section, AMI is important to understand because it includes local context in the numbers. Housing affordability can mean very different things in different parts of the state, and AMI allows us to understand levels of housing need across communities with different market conditions.
In cases where a development is supported by a subsidy, such as LIHTC or HOME, the subsidy may impose restrictions on who can live in the unit based on the percentage of the AMI they earn. In order to provide housing for families at different income levels but still in need of housing, the development could, for example, have 20 apartments affordable to families earning 30 percent of the AMI and another 20 apartments affordable to families earning 50 percent of the AMI. All of these units are considered affordable but include families at different levels of need.
In addition to adjusting for the AMI in the location, housing programs typically adjust income thresholds based on the number of people in the household. This helps to account for the fact that larger households will need larger, and therefore more expensive, units.
HUD publishes these thresholds based on bedroom size at the county and metropolitan statistical area (MSA) levels. They are updated each year in the HUD Income Limit Tool.
Other Market Considerations
Above we discussed the technicalities of affordability as it is laid out by federal funders and is required for grants, but often what is top of mind might be more specific issues related to the community. Issues such as poverty, poor living conditions, addiction and day-to-day hardship for the most vulnerable community members might have surfaced in a Housing Needs Assessment or in community conversations. It is important to consider these factors when determining the affordability structure.
Permanent Supportive Housing
Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) is a model that combines low-barrier affordable housing, health care, and supportive services to help individuals and families lead more stable lives. PSH typically targets people who experience multiple barriers to housing and are unable to maintain housing stability without supportive services.
Permanent Supportive Housing projects can support a variety of populations including:
-
Formerly homeless — One of the largest populations served by permanent supportive housing, formerly homeless individuals include any individual who has been homeless or doubling up with friends or family members for a year or more. It may also target individuals who cannot access other low-income housing options available, due to former evictions or drug history.
-
Living with Disabilities — For many of the most vulnerable populations, living with disabilities such as mental illness and chronic health conditions can make it difficult to maintain a stable home without assistance. Permanent Supportive Housing typically combines housing with other supportive services such as mental health services, health services, addiction treatment, and more, in order to address the needs of residents living with disabilities.
-
Seniors — Permanent Supportive Housing is also crucial in providing stable housing for the low-income aging population. Typically referred to as Senior Housing, PSH for this population will also generally include a wide range of supportive services focused on health and wellness of residents.
Market Study
A market study examines the housing demand for your development, as well as how your development relates to the overall real-estate environment. A market study demonstrates the “market” for your development: Will there be consumers to live in it and will homes be offered at prices they can afford to pay? Many developers hire a third-party firm to complete a market analysis. In fact, it is a requirement of the Qualified Allocation Plan in Mississippi to use an independent third-party for your market study. While you will likely hire a consultant to undertake this study, it will be helpful to familiarize yourself with the key components of a market study and how it can strengthen your project. A market study also serves as a risk management tool for your development. It will help you understand project feasibility and highlight areas to refine your project concept for better alignment with local needs and market conditions.
Upfront Considerations
Market studies include common pieces of information and analysis. However, as you undertake your market study, there are two key considerations to account for upfront:
Alignment with funder requirements: Most public and private funding sources require a market study and outline specific requirements for what to include in it. Prior to undertaking your market study, it is important to understand these requirements. For example, Market Studies submitted to the MHC must comply with Appendix F, Market Study Guide in the Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP).
Alignment with your housing development model: A market study should be tailored to your housing development model. For instance, subsidized affordable housing may require more detailed analysis to ensure there will be enough households with incomes to qualify to live there and that your development model can sustain enough cash flow from rents or supplemental sources. Should these change, throughout the design process, you will need to adjust your market study.
Elements of a Market Study
Data Sources for Market Study
Federal agencies and private companies maintain data that can assist with the creation of a market study.
-
US Census and American Community Survey - provides a range of annual data based on household surveys
-
Ribbon Demographics - fee-for-service housing market analysis and data services
-
ESRI - a provider of both software and data. ESRI has multiple platforms, including Community and Business Analyst products with built-in market analysis tools. There is a cost, but they provide a discount to nonprofits.
-
Corelogic - fee-for-service company that provides detailed market data and comparable sites based on real estate transaction data and landlord surveys
-
CoStar - fee-for-service company that provides detailed market data and comparable sites based on real estate transaction data and landlord surveys
-
USDA - provides its own list of publicly available data sources that may be helpful in rural areas
-
Social Explorer - a fee-for-service online platform providing maps and data related to a range of topics
-
PolicyMap - a free online mapping platform that allows you to explore a range of built-in data and create your own maps.
-
National Housing Preservation Database - a free dataset displaying the locations and subsidy types for all federally-assisted housing developments across the country
-
Zillow Research - publishes free local data and rents, home prices and other factors
Assessing Financial Feasibility
Determining financial feasibility will help you understand the viability of your project. For a project to be considered viable, the cost of building and operating it must be less than or equal to the income and other funding you anticipate the project to generate or receive. Similar to your assessment of your internal capacity, an initial analysis of financial feasibility will help you determine what you have available and what gaps you need to fill.
To get a baseline understanding of what gaps exist, you may only need to complete “back of the envelope” calculations. These calculations can inform the development model that you select as well as the funding sources you decide to pursue. These estimated calculations are not perfect, but they provide quick insight into anticipated cash flow and needs. The simple way to complete a BOE calculation is to estimate expected project income relative to estimated project costs. There are a few online calculators that can help you with this process:
-
Grounded Solutions calculator captures more varied building types.
-
Urban Institute calculator is limited to rental buildings that are either 50 units or 100 units.
Once you have done some basic financial feasibility, you will want to model the project in a pro forma.
Financial Modeling and Funding
Before we work to secure funding, you must understand what funding is needed and what operating income might be realized. To understand the budget needs, you should conduct a financial feasibility analysis of your project. Even if you are engaging a consultant to help with securing funding, it is important that multiple members of your development team understand the different components of the financial model so you can use the information most effectively.
You will learn the components of a pro forma workbook to test and analyze the impact of changes to your development model or addition of different funding sources on your project’s financial feasibility. Ultimately, you will use the pro forma to demonstrate to funders that your project is worthy of their investment.
Many affordable housing projects need to engage a consultant or technical assistance provider to perform a full financial analysis to demonstrate that a project is a sound investment. Engaging an expert to perform a financial analysis is another opportunity to learn from an experienced partner and build capacity for financial analysis in-house. All development partners should also be involved in the financial feasibility assessment process to ensure they understand and are able to communicate the results.
Estimates and Financial Feasibility
In the pre-development stage, you will not know for certain how much things will cost or how much funding you will be able to secure. As a result, this analysis will be based on a series of estimates and assumptions about your development model, information from your Project Team, plus data collected for the market analysis.
Types of estimates you will need to analyze financial feasibility:
-
Cost of land, labor, and materials for acquisition, site work, and construction (AKA “hard costs”)
-
Other costs not related to labor and materials, like fees and insurance (AKA “soft costs”)
-
Anticipated income from the project (residential and commercial rents collected; income from parking, laundry, or service fees; rental assistance) on an annual basis
-
Anticipated vacancy rate
-
Operating expenses (taxes, insurance costs, utilities that are not paid by tenants, repair and maintenance costs, and other administrative or management costs)
-
Operating and replacement reserve budgets, in case there are shortfalls or larger items (like HVAC) need replacement during your building’s lifespan
-
Debt service or other financing costs
There are four primary ways we use this information to analyze and summarize the project’s financial needs. The follow components together are often referred to as a “pro forma.”
-
A Development Budget, where you detail the costs of building your project and getting it ready for people to live in.
-
A Sources and Uses statement, where you summarize the funding, you have relative to the development costs they will cover.
-
Operating Income and Expenses, which helps calculate rental income and debt service
-
A pro forma schedule of income and expenses, where you estimate how your project costs and revenues will accrue over time.
Many refer to all these components as a “pro forma” together because they are typically found within the same workbook and the pro forma forecasting spreadsheet is typically populated with values from the other sheets and can be useful in doing base calculations. We have a sample pro forma in the tools for you to use.
Key definitions
- Debt is money you borrow from lenders and pay back at regular intervals
- Equity is money paid by investors in exchange for partial ownership of the project; and grants are money you do not pay back but are awarded because your project meets the goals of the grantees.
Completing Your Pro Forma
The sections of a pro forma are below. Use these examples for homeownership and rental projects to fill in each component. See the Financial Modeling Tool page.
Pro Forma Component: Development Budget
A development budget captures all costs required to build your project and place it in service (or have it generally readied for occupancy).
The development budget includes the following costs:
-
Land and site work costs
-
Construction or rehabilitation costs
-
Professional fees, including consulting costs
-
Interim construction costs
-
Permanent financing costs
-
Soft costs, which are costs not directly related to construction labor and building materials. This includes costs such as architecture, engineering, permitting, and legal fees. Some soft costs such as insurance may continue after construction is completed.
-
Predevelopment costs (Development costs that are incurred prior to construction, such as those described in the predevelopment section of this guide. This consists mainly of soft costs but will not be the only part of the process where soft costs are incurred.)
-
Developer fee
-
Project reserves
The sum of costs across each category represents your total development cost (TDC), or Development budget.
As you are working on your Development Budget, keep in mind that funding sources may cap the maximum cost per unit. For example, in order to apply for tax credits in Mississippi, projects are subject to the maximum cost per unit.
Pro Forma Component: Sources and Uses Statement and Permanent Financing
A “sources and uses of funds” statement is used to summarize your project’s financing and how that compares to your development budget. In other words, do you have sufficient funding to cover the costs of building your project?
This statement should capture all sources of financing, their amounts, and what costs they will cover. You have already calculated your “uses” in your development budget. These are your costs within each category mentioned above. You may want or be required to include additional details about each source of financing, such as the type (loan, grant, tax credit, in-kind support, equity investment, etc.) and whether the funding is private or public (federal, state, or local).
Have this statement prepared before you seek funding from a lender or additional funder and include documentation to demonstrate that the funding listed in the statement has been secured. This may include award and commitment letters or partnership agreements.
What is the difference between construction financing and permanent financing?
Construction loans are shorter-term financing, only intended to cover project costs during the construction phase. After construction is completed, this debt is converted to a permanent loan to be paid back (or amortized) over a longer period. This period can range from 5 to 40 years.
A sources and uses of funds statement does not include the details of when your costs and revenues will accrue over your project’s lifetime. Those details are included on your pro forma schedule of income and expenses (or cash flow analysis). See the Financial Modeling Tool and Guidance for more specific guidance and a template you can use for your own analysis. There are two sheets that help you analyze the short term and long-term revenue and costs of the project in the Financial Modeling Tool.
You can use the pro forma workbook to test the impact of different components of your development model or different funding sources on your project’s financial feasibility. Ultimately, you will use the pro forma to demonstrate to funders that you need their investment and, if applicable, will be able to pay them back. When preparing your pro forma for funders to review, you may need to provide additional documentation to back up the information included (e.g., if you say you have a certain amount of funding already secured, provide documentation that confirms this).
Pro Forma Component: Operating Income and Expenses
The operating pro forma helps to assess the amount of square footage developed relative to the amount of revenue it will generate. Do your best to get accurate data, as inaccurate assumptions can lead to dramatic swings in actual property performance. There are several factors that need to be considered to derive an accurate operating pro forma:
-
Costs to Operate
-
Salaries: do you need to pay a full-time or part-time property manager, is there a way to spread this time over a few properties?
-
Trash and recycling fees
-
Grounds maintenance
-
Property insurance
-
Reserves
-
Type of units (number of bedrooms and baths per units)
-
Number of each type of unit
-
Projected rents or planned sales prices:
-
For rental projects, you need to assess Fair Market Rents in your area. Make sure projected rents are reflective of current market conditions for comparable properties in your area. If you have project-based vouchers, you can assume full rent for residents at varying incomes, if not, rents should be scaled to remain affordable to the target income brackets you are setting out to serve. See calculating affordability.
-
For homeownership projects, the proforma will factor in planned sales prices, which will be the project’s revenue source.
Pro Forma Component: 15-year Financing
The 15-year financing pro forma will help you assess some key financial metrics for your development. The most common metrics lenders and funders will use to determine whether and how much debt they will offer to a project are the Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DCR, DSC, or DSCR) and loan-to-value ratio (LTV or LVR). Lenders use these metrics to evaluate how likely they are to be repaid for a loan. Recognizing financial analyses are built on assumptions, lenders look for additional cushion between your NOI and the amount of debt they will authorize for your project.
The DCR, which is a ratio of your cash flow to debt payment, reflects the amount of this cushion a lender is looking for. Lenders often seek a 1.25 minimum DCR, meaning that your project cash flow must be equal to or greater than 1.25 times your required debt service. Some funders will use a lower DCR (e.g., 1.15) based on their risk tolerance or perception of risk.
For a rental project, the debt coverage ratio is determined by rental revenue, and the lender’s source of repayment is the net operating income of the property. For a homeownership project, the source of repayment is the mortgages taken out by home buyers.
Pro Forma Conclusion: Determining Your Funding Needs
With your pro forma package estimates, you will be able to project how much of a gap you have between income and expenses (i.e., your “Net Operating Income” or NOI) and how much cash you may have on-hand after paying your debt service (i.e., your “cash flow”). If either of these figures are negative, you will need to find additional funding to close that gap and/or adjust your development model (number of units, square footage, design features) to reduce costs. If you utilize the Financial Modeling Tool, the up- front gap will be evident on the permanent financing tab.
Rental Finance
- Rent accounts for income, not sales
- The debt coverage ratio is determined by rental revenue
- Developer fee usually earns fee during construction, or deferred in “cash flow”
- Interim financing is repaid at once
- The term lender’s source of repayment is the Net Operating Income on the property.
Homeownership Finance
- Sale prices are the revenue source to pay for development costs
- The developer earns developer fee from profit margin on sales
- Interim financing is paid off incrementally
- The source of repayment will be the consumer mortgage loans made to home buyers
- Additional resources may be used to cover the gap between development costs and revenue expected from affordable purchase price
